Coque samsung galaxy s4 rouge overview for Berzerker7 coque samsung galaxy core plus sm-g350-coque iphone 5c smile-gbywms

Januar 20th, 2020 von sten

The association is the coque iphone 5s rose silicone weak link here and is secured through the “something you know”. It can be redirected or revoked without any physical tampering, through only knowing some basic things you know like the account coque transparebte iphone xr number and password.

That coque coque iphone xr manga one piece iphone 5c verte still does not make it “something you have.” Because you require physical possession of the addressed or registered to device, that fits the definition.

I don’t care how many people are ignorant of this and want to prove that it’s somehow a physical factor, it’s not, unless there coque iphone 4 effet iphone 5 the sender of the SMS can somehow guarantee that the message is being sent to a specific device.

You are the one who is showing great ignorance.

That is what the SIM card is for. Carriers make coque iphone 5c recto verso sure tommy hilfiger coque iphone xr the number can only be associated with a single registered IMEI and SIM card, otherwise, you could, without any coque iphone avec memoire user/owner interaction, set up another device to receive coque iphone 5s league of coque iphone xr antichoc paillette legend phone calls and SMS, which you cannot do. Your logic is flawed. So much so, that your logic nullifies TOTP and U2F, along with every single other second factor out there, from being multi factor as well, since I can “change” or “secure” it behind other forms of credentials.

Holy shit, the downvotes by the misinformed. Or is it those with vested interest in making coque iphone 5 tongue us less secure

If you have read my replies thoroughly, coque iphone 5s armenie you know that I not advocating for the use of coque iphone xr doudou SMS as 2FA. While it not secure, it is multi factor coque iphone 11 manga by definition.

Things that are not lot de coque iphone 4s physically secured are not a physical factor. SMS is secured by your account information and is therefore not coque effet miroir iphone xr a physical security factor. It’s the same coque iphone forest factor as a password. It is slightly more secure coque iphone 5c argenté than coque iphone 6 transparente avec ecriture a password alone, but it’s not a second security factor.

Again, you really need an education course on how multi factor authentication works. SMS messages can only be sent to a physical device that has that number registered as its receiving ID. That requires you to have a device registered with that SMS ID (phone number) in order to receive the message. That is literally by definition “something you have.”

It ok to be wrong, don double down on information you think is correct, do some second guessing, go look at definitions and you realize your mistakes quickly. You digging yourself further and further (and no one believes your incorrect information) by digging coque iphone 5 multicolor your heels in like this.

SMS is not sent to a SIM, it’s sent coque iphone 5s zelda breath of the wild to a phone number.

What do you think a phone number coque iphone 6s jacker is registered to

The network is what makes SMS a “something coque iphone purpose you know” factor, because SMS messages can be intercepted or redirected by that network using your account number and perhaps mother’s maiden name.

That is not all how “something you X” works. I suggest you do some basic research on multi factor authentication.

TOTP might be stored in your phone, but the phone itself is strongly secured, usually using biometrics. Physical tokens are obviously secure. Both rely on cryptographically secure math, making it practically infeasible to reproduce the private key stored in them. That is the literal definition coque iphone se fantaisie of “something you have.” This includes SMS…

Geschrieben in Allgemeines |

Einen Kommentar abgeben

Bitte beachte: Die Kommentare werden moderiert. Dies kann zu Verzögerungen bei Deinem Kommentar führen. Es besteht kein Grund den Kommentar erneut abzuschicken.